Arulkumar v. The District Collector

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 28.01.2016

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN W.P.No.2932 of 2016 Arulkumar ... Petitioner Vs

1. The District Collector, Krishnagiri District.

2. The Tahsildar, Uthangarai Taluk, Krishnagiri District.

3. Poongan

4. Menaga ... Respondents Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for the issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to take necessary action to remove the illegal encroachments and obstructions on the pathway in Government Poramboke Survey No.31 of Parasanoor Village, Uthangarai Taluk by the respondents 3 and 4.

For Petitioner : No Appearance https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

ORDER

(Order of the Court was delivered by SATISH K. AGNIHOTRI,J.,) When the matter was called in the first round, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the matter was passed over. Again, when the matter was called in the second round, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner nor there was any representation made on his behalf. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar ra.

To

1. The District Collector, Krishnagiri District.

2. The Tahsildar, Uthangarai Taluk, Krishnagiri District.

+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.6176 W.P. No.2932 of 2016 SCD(CO) CA(09/02/2016) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/