Thaiyanayagi v. Panneerselvam
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 02.07.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN and C.M.P.No.1534 of 2022 Thaiyanayagi W/o.Thangavel Vinayagar Koil Street Gunamangalam Village Cuddalore Taluk Cuddalore District ... Appellant Vs.
1.Panneerselvam W/o.Thangavel Vinayagar Koil Street Gunamangalam Village Cuddalore Taluk Cuddalore District 2.The Manager Cuddalore District Central Cooperative Bank Ltd., Beach Road, Cuddalore 607 001 ... Respondents Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 96 of Code of Civil Proceedure against the 1/4
judgment and decree dated 20.09.2021 passed in O.S.No.292 of 2020 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Cuddalore District, Cuddalore. For Appellant : Mr.P.Sesubalan Raja For Respondents : No appearance
JUDGMENT
Appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree dated 20.09.2021 passed in O.S.No.292 of 2020 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Cuddalore District, Cuddalore.
2.Learned counsel for the Appellant seeks leave of this Court to withdraw this Appeal and he has also made an endorsement to that effect. The said endorsement is extracted as under:
"The Appellant is permitted to withdraw this Appeal and allowed to present the Plaint before the District Court. Considering the fact that the age of Plaintiff/Appellant is around 89, the District Court may be directed to dispose the Appeal within a stipulated period."
3.The Appellant herein has filed a Suit in O.S.No.292 of 2020. In which 2/4
the learned Principal District Judge, Cuddalore held that the very same prayer has already been granted and the Plaintiff was already declared as legalheir of Anusuya and declaration relief was also granted in O.S.No.324 of 2015 dated 22.07.2016. The learned Principal District Judge, Cuddalore further held that on the same ground, again very same prayer cannot be gone into and accordingly he has dismissed the Suit. Hence the appeal. 4.In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the Appellant, this Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file proper application before proper forum. In the event of such application being filed, the Court, concerned is required to deal the matter as expeditiously as possible, since the Plaintiff is said to be a senior citizen aged about 89 years. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 02.07.2024 Index : Yes/No : Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order sai 3/4
RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN.J, sai To The Principal District Judge, Cuddalore District, Cuddalore.
and C.M.P.No.1534 of 2022 Dated: 02.07.2024 4/4