← Library
Madras High CourtCS/774/2001dismissed for default

T.A.R.Agro Farms Pvt.Ltd. v. Sachit Kumar Sahipal

2018-04-18Honourable Mr Justice V. Bharathidasan4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED :18.04.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN C.S.No.774 of 2001 T.A.R. Agro Farms Pvt. Ltd.

... Plaintiff Vs

1. Sachit Kumar Sahipal

2. Punjab & Sind Bank, Roshanpura Branch, represented by its Branch Manager, New Delhi-110 043.

3. Punjab and Sind Bank, rep. by its General Manager, Zonal Office, Ashram, New Delhi.

4. Punjab and Sind Bank, H Block, Cannaught Place, New Delhi - 110 001, rep. by its Branch Manager.

5. Solar Finvest (P) Ltd., New Delhi

6. City Union Bank Ltd., G.T.Branch, Armenian Street, Chennai-600 001.

7. City Union Bank Ltd., Karol Bagh, New Delhi-110 005.

8. Chandra Prakash ...Defendants

Plaint under Order IV, Rule 1 O.S Rules read with Order VII Rule 1 of C.P.C praying for a judgment and decree against the defendant, a) directing the Punjab & Sind Bank, the defendants 2 to 4 herein, to pay the plaintiff a sum of Rs.1,48,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore forty eight lakhs only) together with subsequent interest at 24% per annum from the date of plaint till date of realisation. For Plaintiff : No appearance For Defendants : No Appearance

JUDGMENT

Earlier the learned counsel appearing for the plaintiff reported "no instructions.". Hence, this Court , by an order dated 15.02.2018, directed the Registry to issue notice to the plaintiff and the matter was posted for hearing on 19.03.2018. Pursuant to the same, notice has been issued to the plaintiff.

2. It is submitted that since the plaintiff company has already been vacated from the said premises, notice could not been

served on the plaintiff.

3. Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, noneappeared for the plaintiff as well as the defendants. Hence, the said suit is dismissed for default.

18.04.2018 mrp

V.BHARATHIDASAN.J mrp C.S.No.774 of 2001 18.04.2018