Saravanan v. The State Rep By Its,

P.DHANABAL , J.

The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in Crime No.29 of 2024 registered by the respondent Police for the offences under Sections 406, 506(ii) IPC.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant got acquainted with the petitioner in the year 2022 and they both fell in love and the petitioner proposed to marry her. Thereafter, the petitioner cheated the defacto complainant and refused to marry her. Hence, this case.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and a false case has been foisted against him. Hence, he prayed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police submitted that the defacto complainant is a divorcee. The petitioner cheated her on the false promise of marrying her. He further 1/4

submitted that there is no previous case pending against the petitioner.

5. Considering the submissions made by both sides and taking into consideration the nature of the offence charged against the petitioner and also the fact that there is a dispute between the parties with regard to marriage and no previous case pending against the petitioner, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned Additional Mahila Court (Magistrate Level), Coimbatore, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:

[a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs 2/4

and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m., for a period of thirty days and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation. [c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC;

09.08.2024 gsk 3/4

P.DHANABAL,J.

gsk 09.08.2024 4/4