← Library
Madras High CourtWP/17995/2012disposed of

R.Ramana Reddy, v. The Chief Administrative Offic

2018-03-02Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 02.03.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM WP.No.17995 of 2012 & M.P.No.1 of 2012 R.Ramana Reddy

...Petitioner

Vs.

1. The Chief Administrative Officer, Koyambedu Wholesale Market Complex, Koyambedu, Chennai - 600 092.

2. E.J.Shankar

3. The Commissioner of Police, Chennai City Police, Egmore, Chennai - 600008.

4. The Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority,1, Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Chennai - 600008.

...Respondents

[R3 & R4 are impleaded as per the order of this Court dated 17.07.2012 in M.P.No.2 of 2012 in W.P.No.17995 of 2012] PRAYER:

Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Direction to direct the 1st respondent to consider the petition of the petitioner dated 12.04.2012 for appropriate action against illegal unauthorised trading and dispose of the same within the time fixed by this Court.

For Petitioner :M/s.Black in Red Law Asso.

For Respondents :Mr.V.Velmurugan (for R1) Mr.Y.Bhuvanesh Kumar (for R2) Mr.V.Shanmuga Sundar, Spl.G.P. (for R3) Mr.N.Sampath (for R4)

ORDER

The prayer in this writ petition is to direct the 1st respndent to consider the petition of the petitioner dated 12.04.2012 and to take appropriate action against illegal unauthorised trading and dispose of the same in a time frame. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsels for the respondents 1, 2 and 4 and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the 3rd respondent.

3. The learned standing counsel for the 1st respondent submitted that the petitioner has not produced any proof for submitting his representation, and if a fresh representation is given by the petitioner, the same be considered in accordance with law.

4. In the light of the limited prayer sought for in this writ petition and the submission of the learned Standing Counsel for the 1st respondent, this Court without going into the merits of the case, directs the petitioner to give fresh representation to the 1st respondent, by enclosing a copy of this order, within a period of two weeks. On such compliance, the 1st respondent shall consider the same and take appropriate action on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks therefrom.

5. With the above observation and direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-vii) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar pvs To

1. The Chief Administrative Officer, Koyambedu Wholesale Market Complex, Koyambedu, Chennai - 600 092.

2. The Commissioner of Police, Chennai City Police, Egmore, Chennai - 600008.

3. The Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, 1, Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore, Chennai - 600 008.

+ 1 cc to Mr. N.Sampath, Advocate Sr.16731 + 1 cc to Mr. the Government Pleader SR.17397 WP.No.17995 of 2012 (Cs-vii) EU(22/03/2018) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/