K.Janarthanan v. State Represented By

Crl.O.P.No.21988 of 2022 Crl.O.P.No.21988 of 2022 A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA , J.

The petitioner who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 324, 323 and 506(ii) IPC, in Crime No.169 of 2022, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution as per the defacto complainant is that due to wordy quarrel between the petitioner and the defacto complainant in temple festival, the petitioner along with other accused abused the defacto complainant in filthy language and attacked with bricks. Due to which, the defacto complainant sustained injuries. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the injured has been discharged from the hospital and hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.O.P.No.21988 of 2022 A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA , J.

ata

4. Per contra, the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that the petitioner is having six previous cases including a murder case against him. Hence, he vehemently opposed for the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Taking into account the nature of offence and the previous antecedents of the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.

13.09.2022 ata Crl.O.P.No.21988 of 2022 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis