← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/21676/2021granted

Govindharaj v. State Rep. By

2021-11-18Honourable Mrs Justice T.V.Thamilselvi3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 18.11.2021

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI Crl.O.P.No.21676 of 2021 Govindharaj .. Petitioner Vs.

State Rep.by ... Respondent The Inspector of Police Veppanapalli Police Station, Krishnagiri District.

(Crime No.29 of 2021) Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., prayed to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.29 of 2021 on the file of the respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.E.Kannadasan For Respondent : Mr.N.S.Suganthan Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

ORDER

The petitioner, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Section 379 of IPC in Crime No.29 of 2021, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with three others had transported 3 units of river sand illegally by using tipper lorry without any valid licence. Hence the complaint.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent person and he has not committed any such offence as alleged by the prosecution. However, on instructions, the learned counsel further submits that the petitioner, on his own volition, is ready and willing to contribute a sum of Rs.20,000/- to the credit of the Tamilnadu Advocates Clerks Association, Chennai that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the respondent opposed for granting of anticipatory bail to the petitioner by stating that the petitioner along with three others had transported 3 units of river sand illegally by using tipper lorry without any valid licence.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the submissions made by the both counsel and also the fact that the petitioner has willfully and on his own volition agreed to contribute a sum of Rs.20,000/- for charitable purpose, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate-II, Krishnagiri, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that:

[a] the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty thousand only) to the Tamilnadu Advocates Clerks Association, Chennai, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and shall produce the said receipt before the Court below.

[b] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

[c] the petitioner is directed to report before the respondent police on every Friday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of four weeks and thereafter as and required for interrogation; [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[e] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions has been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme

Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]; [g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

-sd/- 18/11/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NO.II, KRISHNAGIRI 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE KRISHNAGIRI [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VEPPANAPALLI POLICE STATION, KRISHNAGIRI DISTRICT 4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

5 THE TAMILNADU ADVOCATES CLERKS ASSOCIATION, CHENNAI +1 CC to M/S. E.KANNADASAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.No.13001 CRL OP.21676/2021 Date :18/11/2021 APN 23/11/2021