← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/21695/2021granted

Iyyappan v. State Rep.By

2021-11-18Honourable Mrs Justice T.V.Thamilselvi3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 18.11.2021

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI Crl.O.P.No.21695 of 2021 Iyyappan .. Petitioner Vs.

State Rep by The Inspector of Police, Cheyyur Police Station, Chengalpattu District.

(Crime No.333 of 2021)

...Respondent

Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in connection with Crime No.333 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Sasikumar For Respondent : Mr.N.S.Suganthan Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

ORDER

(The case has been heard through video conference) The petitioner, who apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 4(1) (a), 4(1)(b), 4(1)(g), 4(1-A) of TNP Act in Cr.No.333 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other s were found in illegal possession of 20 litres of ID Arrack and 2400 litres of wash. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. However, on instructions, the learned counsel further submits that the petitioner, on his own volition, is ready and willing to contribute a sum of Rs.10,000/- to the credit of the Tamilnadu Advocates Clerks Association, Chennai that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submits that the petitioner along with others were found in illegal possession of 20 litres of ID Arrack and 2400 litres of wash. He further submits that there is no previous case as against the petitioner. However, he vehemently opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the submissions made by the both counsel and also the fact that the petitioner has willfully and on his own volition agreed to contribute a sum of Rs.10,000/- for charitable purpose, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned District Munsif- Cum-Judicial Magistrate, Cheyyur, on condition that the petitioner shall execute separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that: [a] the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) to the Tamilnadu Advocates Clerks Association, Chennai, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and shall produce the said receipt before the Court below.

[b] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

[c] the petitioner is directed to report before the respondent police on every Friday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of four weeks and thereafter as and required for interrogation; [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[e] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

-sd/- 18/11/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE DISTRICT MUNSIFF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, CHEYYUR 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE CHENGALPATTU(FOR INFORMATION) 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHEYYUR POLICE STATION, CHENGALPATTU DISTRICT.

4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

5 TAMILNADU ADVOCATES CLERKS ASSOCIATION, CHENNAI CC to M/S. R.SASIKUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO.12987 CRL OP.21695/2021 Date :18/11/2021 RVR 22/11/2021