Sikkyammal @ Latha v. State Rep By
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 11.08.2023
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARAN Crl.O.P.No. 18421 of 2023 Sikkyammal@Latha
...Petitioner
Vs.
The State Represented by, The Inspector of Police, Hudco Police Station, Hosur Krishnagiri District.
Crime No.266 of 2023
...Respondent
PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.266 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.Rajendraprasad For Respondent : Mr.S.Rajakumar Additional Public Prosecutor 1/6
ORDER
The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 22.07.2023 for the offences punishable under Sections 3 (1) and 5(1) (A) ITP Act in Crime No.266 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, petitioner is an innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner is in judicial custody from 22.07.2023. Thus, he prays for grant of bail.
3. In reply, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that, petitioner was running brothel house, where he used the victims for prostitution. Victims had now been rescued and sent to Home. He further submitted that, petitioner has one similar previous case registered in the year 2019. Hence, he opposed for grant of bail to the petitioner. 2/6
4. Considering the nature, facts and circumstances of the case and having regard to the fact that petitioner is in judicial custody from 22.07.2023 and that the material part of the investigation might have been over by this time, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
5. Accordingly, petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No. II, Hosur and on further conditions that :- [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.
[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30.a.m., and 05.00.p.m., until further orders.
3/6
[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC. 11.08.2023 sma 4/6
To
1. Judicial Magistrate No. II, Hosur
2. Central Jail, Salem.
3.The Inspector of Police, Hudco Police Station, Hosur Krishnagiri District.
4.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.
5/6
G.CHANDRASEKHARAN. J.
sma 11.08.2023 6/6