← Library
Madras High CourtWP/34397/2025dismissed

N.S.Kalaiselvan v. The District Collector

2025-09-15Honourable The Chief Justice,Honourable Mr.Justice G.Arul Murugan5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 15.09.2025 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN N.S.Kalaiselvan S/o Siddhan D.No.8/180, Muthumariamman Kovil Street, Naarthampatty Village and Post, Nallampally Taluk, Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector Dharmapuri District, Dharmapuri 2.The Deputy Director Geology and Mining Department, First Floor, District Collector's Office Campus, 3.The Tahsildar, Nallampally Taluk,

4.The Block Development Officer Nallampally Taluk, 5.The District Forest Officer Collector Office Building Dharmauri District 6.R.Govindasamy S/o Ramasamy, New 4th Ward, Chinnagoundampatty Village, Thaaramangalm P.O, Omalur T.K., Salem District 7.Kalaiyarasan S/o.Uthirasamy No 5-56/ 190 Palpaakikuttkaadu Village, R.C. Cheety Patti P.O, Omalur T.K, Salem District 8.The Chairman and Managing Director The Dilip Buildcon Limited, Plot No 5, Inside Govvin and Narayana Sing Gate, Bhopal 462 016 Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the official respondents 1 to 5 to restrain the respondents 6 to 8 from operating the quarry in S.No.290/3 and other lands owned by the 7th respondent in Boothanahalli Village, Nallampalli Taluk, Dharmapuri District on the basis of petitioner's representation dated 28.04.2025.

For Petitioner:

Mr.K.Gandhi Kumar For Respondents:

Mr.A.Edwin Prabakar State Government Pleader for respondent Nos.1 to 5

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. This petition has been filed only on the apprehension that respondent No.8 is likely to be granted quarry lease, which according to the petitioner, cannot be located at the site as has been proposed by respondent No.8.

3. On petitioner's own showing, so far no quarry lease has been granted in favour of respondent No.8.

3. The petition is premature. The authorities are presumed to act in accordance with law.

4. In case there is any quarry granted, it is open for the petitioner to take the remedy in that regard. There shall be no order as to costs.

(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 15.09.2025 Index :

Yes/No :

Yes/No bbr To:

1.The District Collector Dharmapuri District, Dharmapuri 2.The Deputy Director Geology and Mining Department, First Floor, District Collector's Office Campus, 3.The Tahsildar, Nallampally Taluk, Dharmapuri District 4.The Block Development Officer Nallampally Taluk, Dharmapuri District 5.The District Forest Officer Collector Office Building Dharmauri District

THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND G.ARUL MURUGAN,J.

bbr 15.09.2025