Tamil Nadu Chennai Doctors v. Mr.M.Saravanan And Another

A.No.4182 of 2022 in C.S.No.697 of 2016 A.No.4182 of 2022 in C.S.No.697 of 2016 G.CHANDRASEKHARAN,J., This application is filed to permit the petitioner to file the xerox copies of the Government records as additional documents in C.S.No.697 of 2016 and permit the petitioner to mark the same as documents in evidence. 2.The learned counsel for the respondents objected this application and submitted that the documents may be admitted subject to admissibility, relevancy and proof.

3.Secondary evidence cannot be received at the first instance. Secondary evidence can be received subject to the reasons given for non production of primary evidence. If the applicant is able to give proper explanation for non production of primary evidence, documents sought to be marked may be received subject to admissibility, relevancy and proof. 4.Accordingly, this application is ordered. Post before the concerned learned Additional Master for recording evidence. sli 27.09.2022 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/2

A.No.4182 of 2022 in C.S.No.697 of 2016 G.CHANDRASEKHARAN,J., sli A.No.4182 of 2022 in C.S.No.697 of 2016 27.09.2022 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/2