Kukesh Kr v. The District Collector

W.M.P.Nos.26535 & 26537 of 2024 in W.P.Nos.24291 & 24294 of 2024 M.SUNDAR, J., and HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J., ., (Order of the Court was made by M.SUNDAR, J.,) This common order will now dispose of the captioned 'Writ Miscellaneous Petitions' [hereinafter 'WMPs' for the sake of brevity].

2. Captioned WMPs have been filed with prayer to dispense with production of 'original Form-III Notices No.960/PA/File-II' [hereinafter 'impugned notices' for the sake of brevity, convenience and clarity].

3. Mr.K.Sakthivel, learned counsel on record for writ petitioners, is before this Court.

4. Learned counsel for writ petitioners submits that the petitioners were not served with original impugned notices but only copy of impugned notices have been affixed in the premises of writ petitioners. However, photocopies of the impugned notices were filed along with the typed set of papers. Learned counsel drew the attention of this Court to relevant part of support affidavit, which reads as follows: M.SUNDAR, J., 1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

and HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J., mk 'I submit that the 4th respondent did not provide the copy of the impugned notice, but on the other hand affixed the same on the door of my house and therefore, the impugned notice could not be produced before this Hon'ble Court and I have taken a photocopy of the same for placing before this Hon'ble Court.'

5. Taking into account the fact that the authenticity of the impugned notices is not subjected to contestation or disputation, we are considering the dispense with prayer.

6. In the light of the narrative thus far, dispense with prayer is acceded to. Captioned WMPs are ordered as prayed for. [M.S.J.,] [H.C.J.,] 09.07.2025 (2/2) mk W.M.P.Nos.26535 & 26537 of 2024 in W.P.Nos.24291 & 24294 of 2024 (2/2) 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis