Vikraman v. Inspector Of Police

Crl.O.P.No.22492 of 2022 Crl.O.P.No.22492 of 2022 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

The petitioner who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offence punishable under Sections 447, 294(b) and 506(ii) of IPC r/w Section 4 of WH Act and Section 3 of TNPPDL Act, in Crime No.651 of 2022, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to land dispute, the petitioners abused the defacto complainant in filthy language. It is further alleged that the petitioner along with other accused damaged the pipeline to the worth of Rs.1000/-, in the land of the defacto complainant. Hence, the complaint.

3. It is seen from the records that this is the third anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioner. The earlier petitions filed by the petitioner were dismissed. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he is ready and willing to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed on him. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Crl.O.P.No.22492 of 2022 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

mn

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioner has six previous cases, similar in nature pending against him and there is no change of circumstances after the previous dismissal orders passed by this Court on merits. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and the bad antecedents of the petitioner and that there is no change of circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 19.09.2022 mn Crl.O.P.No.22492 of 2022 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis