A.Vedapuri v. The District Collector

W.M.P.No.26745 of 2024 in W.P.No.24449 of 2024 M.SUNDAR, J., and T.VINOD KUMAR. J., (Order of the Court was made by M.SUNDAR, J.,) This order will now dispose of the captioned 'Writ Miscellaneous Petition' [hereinafter 'WMP' for the sake of brevity].

2. Captioned WMP has been filed with prayer to dispense with production of 'original order passed by second respondent in Na.Ka.Aa.1/1576764/2023 dated 10.02.2024 and original order passed by fifth respondent in Na.Ka.No.2803/E/2024 dated 26.03.2024' [hereinafter 'impugned orders' for the sake of brevity, convenience and clarity].

3. Mr.R.Vinothkumar, learned counsel on record for writ petitioner, is before this Court.

4. Learned counsel for writ petitioner submits that the original impugned orders were not readily available with writ petitioner at the time of filing of captioned writ petition and therefore, photocopies of the impugned orders were filed along with the typed set of papers and that has necessitated the captioned WMP.

1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

M.SUNDAR, J., and T.VINOD KUMAR. J., mk

5. Taking into account the fact that the authenticity of the impugned orders is not subjected to contestation or disputation, as a one off case, we are considering the dispense with prayer making it clear that in the days to come, adequate articulation in the support affidavit is imperative.

6. In the light of the narrative thus far, dispense with prayer is acceded to. Captioned WMP is ordered as prayed for. [M.S.J.,] [T.V.K.J.,] 01.08.2025 (2/2) mk W.M.P.No.26745 of 2024 in W.P.No.24449 of 2024 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis