M/S Surana Industires Ltd., v. M/S. Deen Dayal Engineering

C.S.No.926 of 2003 and C.S.No.214 of 2004 C.S.No.926 of 2003 and C.S.No.214 of 2004 and A.No.7148 of 2015 C.SARAVANAN, J.

These cases are listed today under the caption "For Being Mentioned".

2. Both the Civil Suits were dismissed pursuant to the submission made by the learned counsels on 16.12.2022.

3. It is informed by the learned counsel for the plaintiff that by oversight the parties had failed to request for refund of Court fee.

4. An affidavit has been filed by the Managing Trustee of the plaintiff requesting for refund of Court fee to the counsel on record. However, the permission of refund of Court fee directly to the counsel cannot be permitted as per the provisions.

5. It is suffice to state there shall be a refund of Court fee to the plaintiff Trust represented by its Managing Trustee Dr.T.D.Naidu. 18.01.2024 arb 1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

C.S.No.926 of 2003 and C.S.No.214 of 2004 C.SARAVANAN, J.

arb C.S.No.926 of 2003 and C.S.No.214 of 2004 and A.No.7148 of 2015 18.01.2024 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis