Abdul Raheem v. State

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Fifth day of November Two Thousand Twenty One PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs Justice T.V. THAMILSELVI CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.22220 of 2021 ABDUL RAHEEM [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs STATE [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TEAM-XII BANK FRAUD TEAM, CCB POLICE, CHENNAI.

CRIME NO.140 OF 2021 For Petitioner : M/S. G.MOHANA KRISHNAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.N.S.SUGANTHAN, Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side) PETITION FOR BAIL 439 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- (The case has been heard through video conference) The petitioner who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 09.10.2021 for the offences under Sections 120(B), 409, 420, 465, 467, 468 and 471 of Indian Penal Code, in Crime No.140 of 2021, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant is the Lyson Legal Manager of HSBC Bank. The petitioner along with A1 who was a bank employee, obtained credit cards and personal loan from the complainant's bank by producing fake KYC documents and fake company and employment details. Hence, the complaint. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is no way connected with the alleged offence and he has been falsely implicated in this case since, he is the brother of A2. He would further submit that the petitioner has been suffering incarceration for more than 45 days from 09.10.2021 and hence, he would pray for grant of bail to the petitioner. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would raise strong objection stating that the amount involved is more than one crore and that the petitioner has borrowed a sum of Rs.2 lakhs by producing fake documents which needs detailed investigation and if the petitioner is released on bail, there is every possibility of the petitioner tampering the evidences.

5.Considering the nature of allegation levelled against the petitioner and the amount involved is more than one crore which needs a detailed investigation and hence, this court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.

-sd/- 25/11/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TEAM-XII BANK FRAUD TEAM, CCB POLICE, CHENNAI.

2 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, PUZHAL 3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

CC to M/S. G.MOHANA KRISHNAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.22220/2021 Date :25/11/2021 JPA 03/12/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/