← Library
Madras High CourtWP/30888/2016allowed

The Garrison Engineers v. V.Dharani

2017-09-18Honourable Mr Justice S.M. Subramaniam6 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 18.09.2017 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM Writ Petition Nos. 30888 and 30889 of 2016 and W.M.P.Nos. 26759, 26760 / 2016, 628 to 631 / Writ Petition No.30888/2016

1. The Garrison Engineers Military Engineering Service4 INS Rajaji, Rep by V.K.Srivastave Ltd Co.

Naval Air Station Arakkonam - 631 002.

2. The Commanding Officer INS Rajaji Naval Air Station Camp Post Akash Ganga Arakkonam - 631 002. ... Petitioners (IN both Wps) Vs.

1. V.Dharani

2. R.Ramesh

3. S.Umashankar

4. K.Radhakrishnan

5. P.Kudiarasu

6. P.Rajasekar

7. A.Chandrasekaran

8. A.Victor

9. M.George 10.P.Jayakumar 11.S.Mohanarangam 12.A.Baskar 13.S.Ibrahimmm 14.T.Winfred Prabakaran 15.K.R.Sarath Babu

16.The Central Government Industrial 17.The Management of Palani Enterprises 28/A, Murugappan Street Stuartpet, Arakkonam - 631 001.

18.The Management of Industrial of M/s.TNR Enterprises 23, V.P.Kovil Street, Palanipet, Arakkonam.

19.The Management of Industrial Engineering Corporation (Madras), Lakshmi Bhavan (Ground Floor) 609, Anna Salai Chennai - 600 006.

20.The Management of R.D.Enterprises Engineering Contractor No.32, Arunachala Reddy, II Street Arakkonam-631 001.

... Respondents Prayer in WP No.30888/2017 : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the 16the respondents the award dated 26.4.2016 in I.D.Nos.308/2001 314/2001 315/2001 316/2001 320/2001 322/2001 325/2001 326/2001 327/2001 332/2001 333/2001 334/2001 335/2001 337/2001 & 98/2002 and quash the same.

For Petitioners: Mr.G.Rajagopalan Assistant Solicitor General of India For Mr.J.Madanagopal Rao Mr.Balan Haridas For Respondents : Mr.Balan Haridas [ For R1 to R15 ] M/s.Usha Raman [ For R17 & R18 ] Writ Petition No.30889/2016 1.P.T.Jagadeesh Kumar 2.L.Edwin Rajan 3.K.Parthasarathy 4.P.Joseph Rajakumar 5.A.Ragamatullah

6.B.Muniendran 7.C.Rajesekharan 8.A.Syed Karimullah 9.J.Muthu 10.S.Simon Sundarraj 11.A.Thivya Raj 12.N.Chandrasekhar Kumar 13.A.S.Andrews Babu 14.M.Murugan 15.D.Divakaran 16.V.Dhandapani 17.The Central Government Industrial 18.The Management of Palani Enterprises 28/A, Murugappan Street Stuartpet, Arakkonam - 631 001.

19.The Management of Industrial of M/s.TNR Enterprises 23, V.P.Kovil Street, Palanipet, Arakkonam.

20.The Management of Industrial Engineering Corporation (Madras), Lakshmi Bhavan (Ground Floor) 609, Anna Salai Chennai - 600 006.

21.The Management of R.D.Enterprises Engineering Contractor No.32, Arunachala Reddy, II Street Arakkonam-631 001.

... Respondents Prayer in WP No.30889/2017 : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the 17th respondent the award dated 26.4.2016 in I.D.Nos.308/2001 314/2001 315/2001 316/2001 320/2001 322/2001 325/2001 326/2001 327/2001 332/2001 333/2001 334/2001 335/2001 337/2001 & 98/2002 and quash the same.

For Petitioners : Mr.G.Rajagopalan Assistant Solicitor General of India For Mr.J.Madanagopal Rao

For Respondents : Mr.Balan Haridas [For R1 to R15] M/s.Usha Raman [For R17 to R19] C O M M O N O R D E R Mr.G.Rajagopalan, the learned Additional Solicitor General of India appearing for the petitioner made a submission that the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court passed an award on 26th April 2016 directing the respondents therein to reinstate the petitioners in each Industrial Dispute, in service within a month of publication of the award.

2.Further it is stated that the workmen are entitled to continuity of service and would be paid salary as per regular scale after reinstatement.

3.Further the learned Additional Solicitor General of India made a submission that it is an exparte award passed without the effective participation of the petitioner/management. Thus, the petitioner/ management had no opportunity to adjudicate the matter before the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court and therefore, the case may be remitted back for fresh trial, so as to conduct a full fledged effective adjudication.

4.The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents/Workmen has not disputed the fact that it is an exparte award. Paragraph 7 of the award dated 26th April 2016, reads as follows:

"7.Some of the petitioners have filed Writ Petition No.36619/2004 before the Hon'ble High Court of Madras against the order of this Tribunal dismissing the applications filed by them to implead three more persons who are contractors in the party array. The case has been stayed during the pendency of the Writ Petition. The writ petition was dismissed as not pressed on 08.12.2015 and thus the say in the matters have been vacated. When the matter was taken up after disposal of the Writ Petition the respondents have failed to enter appearance in spite of postings given for their appearance. So Respondents have been set exparte."

5.Thus, it is made it clear that the petitioner/management had not participated in the adjudicative process and they remained exparte. At this stage, this Court need not go into the

merits and demerits of the case, since the petitioner/management was set exparte and the same was not disputed. Any matter under trial before the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court has to be adjudicated in full and a complete adjudication will alone provide a better solution and decision on the issues involved in the dispute.

6.That apart, this Court cannot now go into all the documents and evidences to be produced before the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court for effective adjudication of the matter. This being the view of this Court, the merits and demerits and the grounds raised in this writ petition, at this stage, need not be adjudicated by this Court and the ends of justice will be met if the matter is remanded back for a full fledged complete adjudication in all respects. 7.Accordingly, the common award passed by the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, Chennai dated 26th April 2016 passed in Industrial Disputes bearing I.D.Nos.

308/2001 314/2001 315/2001 316/2001 320/2001 322/2001 325/2001 326/2001 327/2001 332/2001 333/2001 334/2001 335/2001 337/2001 & 98/2002 are set aside and the matter is remitted back to the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, Chennai for re-trial and respective parties are at liberty to file necessary applications before the Central Government Industrial Tribunal in all respects for effective adjudication of the matter.

8.Now, it is brought to the notice of this Court that the Tribunal is not functioning. However, taking note of the long pendency of these cases, the Tribunal shall dispose of the same as early as possible, preferably within a period of six months from the date of appointment of the Presiding Officer in the Tribunal.

9.In fine, these writ petitions are disposed of with the above directions.

No costs.

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VIII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar

To The Presiding Officer The Central Government Industrial +2cc to M/s.Usha Ramman, Advocate sr.70176 & 70177 +1cc to M/s.Balan Haridas, Advocate sr.68127 +1cc to M/s.J.Madanagopal, Advocate sr.67836 W.P.Nos.30888 & 30889 of 2017 cp(co) ss(27/10/2017)