Natarajan, v. The State Rep. By The

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 30.11.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH W.P.No.19082 of 2013 Natarajan

...Petitioner

vs.

The State Represented by The Sub Inspector of Police, Mangalam Police Station, Mangalam, Thiurvannamalai District.

...Respondent

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to grant police protection to the petitioner based on the petition dated 16.02.2013 to fix water pipe lines in the land in S.No.411 in Paadagam Vilalge, Polur Taluk, Tiruvannamalai district and for other consequential orders. For Petitioner :

No appearance For Respondent :

Mr.K.Balamurugan, GA

O R D E R

When the matter was taken up for hearing on 15.11.2016, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and hence, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption "For Dismissal" on 29.11.2016. Even today, (i.e. 30.11.2016), there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner either in person or through the learned counsel on record. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(J) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

ari To The Sub Inspector of Police, The State Mangalam Police Station, Mangalam, Thiurvannamalai District.

+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No. 71054 W.P.No.19082 of 2013 AD (CO) PSI(28/12/2016) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/