← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/19664/2025dismissed

Shagul Hameed v. State Rep By The Inspector Of Police

2025-07-14Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 14.07.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Shagul Hameed ... Petitioner Vs.

State represented by, The Inspector of Police, PEW Ambattur Unit, Avadi City.

(Crime No.82 of 2025) ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.82 of 2025 pending on the file of the respondent Police. For Petitioner : Mr.B.S.Manikandan For Respondent : Mr.R.Vinothraja Government Advocate (Criminal Side)

ORDER

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 20.05.2025, in connection with Crime No.82 of 2025 registered on the file of the respondent for the offences under Sections 8(c), 20(b)(ii)(B) of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, seeks bail.

Page No.1 of 4

2. The case of the prosecution is that the accused was found to be in illegal possession of 14 kilograms of Ganja. Hence the case.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed on him. Hence, he prayed for grant of bail to the petitioner.

4. Learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and opposed for the grant of bail to the petitioner. He further submitted that the petitioner, in his confession, himself had stated that he had bought the contraband from the State of Odissa. He also submitted the investigation is under progress.

5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

6. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case and taking note of the submission made by the learned Government Advocate Page No.2 of 4

(Criminal Side), this Court feels that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is necessary for the purpose of investigation. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 14.07.2025 ham To

1. The Judicial Magistrate, Ambattur.

2. The Inspector of Police, PEW Ambattur Unit, Avadi City.

3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

Page No.3 of 4

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN , J.

ham 14.07.2025 Page No.4 of 4