Madras High CourtWP/25092/2021withdrawn dismissed

N.Nallamuthu v. The Secretary To Government

2021-11-24Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 24.11.2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P.NO.25092 OF 2021 AND W.M.P.NOS.26435 TO 26437 OF 2021 N.Nallamuthu ... Petitioner .Vs.

1. The Secretary to Government Public Works (N.1) Department, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600 009.

2. The Principal Chief Engineer (General), Water Resources Organization, Public Works Department, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.

3. The Chief Engineer Public Works Department, Trichy Region, Trichy - 20.

4. The District Collector Salem District, Salem.

5. The Superintending Engineer, Public works Department, Upper Cauvery Basin Circle, Salem - 7.

6. The Chief Engineer (Distribution), (TANGEDCO), Erode Division, No.948, E.V.N.Road, Erode - 9.

7. The Superintending Engineer, (TANGEDCO), Mettur Electricity Distribution Circle, Mettur, Salem District.

8. The Tahsildar, Sankagiri Taluk, Sankagiri, Salem District.

9. The Block Development Officer, Sankagiri Panchayat Union, Sankagiri, Salem District.

10.The President, S.M.75, Nedunkulam Lift Irrigation Cooperative Society, Thevoor Via, Poolampatti Via, Nedunkulam Post - 637 107, Edappadi Taluk, Salem District.

11.C.Prakasam 12.Maheswari 13.P.Senthilkumar 14.S.Periyasamy 15.Chinnusamy 16.Nanjappan 17.V.P.Sivakumar 18.Senrayan 19.Marimuthu 20.Chinnusamy ... Respondents Prayer:

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the entire records relating to the impugned G.O. issued by the 1st respondent in G.O.Ms.No.70 Public Works (N.1) Department, dated 02.03.2020 and quash the same.

For Petitioner : Mr.C.Prakasam

For Respondents : Mr.M.R.Gokul Krishnan for R1 to R5, R8 to R10 Government Advocate Mr.L.Jai Venkatesh for R6 and R7 Government Advocate No Appearance for R11 to R20

O R D E R

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks the permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to the petitioner to work out the remedy in the manner known to law.

2.In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn and liberty is granted to the petitioner to work out the remedy in the manner known to law. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar pri To