← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/22329/2021granted

Kumanan v. Inspector Of Police

2021-11-25Honourable Mrs Justice T.V.Thamilselvi4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 25.11.2021

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI Crl.O.P.No.22329 of 2021 Kumanan ... Petitioner Vs.

Inspector of Police Vikravandi Police Station, Villupuram District.

(Crime No.496 of 2021) ... Respondent Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., praying to enlarge the petitioner in the event of his arrest concerned in Crime No.496 of 2021 on the file of Inspector of Police, Vikravandi Police Station, Villupuram District on his appearance before the concerned Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Kannan For Respondent : Mr.N.S.Suganthan Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

ORDER

The petitioner, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Section 379 IPC and Section 21(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development Regulation) Act in Crime No.496 of 2021, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner had illegally transported 1 units of river sand illegally by using Tractor and Tipper without any valid licence. Hence the complaint.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any such offence as alleged by the prosecution. However, on instructions, the learned counsel further submits that the petitioner, on his own volition, he is ready and willing to contribute a sum of Rs.10,000/- to the credit of the Legal Service Authority, Villupuram Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the respondent opposed for granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner by stating that petitioner had illegally transported 1 unit of river sand by using Tractor and tipper without any valid licence.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the submissions made by the both counsel and also the fact that the petitioner has willfully and on his own volition agreed to contribute a sum of Rs.10,000/- for charitable purpose, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned District Munsif-Cum-Judicial Magistrate,Vikravandi, Villupuram District on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that: [a] the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Teny thousand only) to the Legal Service Authority, Villupuram, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and shall produce the said receipt before the Court below. [b] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

[c] the petitioner is directed to report before the respondent police on every Thursday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of four weeks and thereafter as and required for interrogation;

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[e] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions has been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]; [g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

-sd/- 25/11/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VIKRAVANDI, VILLUPURAM DISTRICT.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VILLUPURAM [FOR INFORMATION].

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE VIKRAVANDI POLICE STATION, VILLUPURAM DISTRICT.

4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

5 THE OFFICER INCHARGE, LEGAL SERVICE AUTHORITY, VILLUPURAM.

6 THE SECRETARY, TAMIL NADU LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

+1 CC to M/S.M.KANNAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO.13606 CRL OP.22329/2021 Date :25/11/2021 JPA 01/12/2021