V.K. Rajamanickam v. The Inspector General
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 24.08.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P.No.32433 of 2004 and V.K.Rajamanickam ... Petitioner Vs.
1. The Inspector General, Department of Registration, Chennai.
2. The District registrar, Kanchipuram.
3. Sub registrar of Kanchipuram, Kanchipuram.
... Respondents Prayer:
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records bearing No.4158/E1/2004 dated 12.09.2004 passed by the 2nd Respondent and quash the same and direct the respondents to give stamp vendor license.
For Petitioners : Mr.M.Ravi, For Respondents : Mrs.K.Bhuvaneswari, Government Advocate.
O R D E R
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the relief sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous and hence the writ petition may be dismissed as infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the petition.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
2. Recording the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS ) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar msvm To
1. The Inspector General, Department of Registration, Chennai.
2. The District registrar, Kanchipuram.
3. Sub registrar of Kanchipuram, Kanchipuram.
+ 1 cc to Mr. Government Pleader Sr.62117, 62072 W.P.No.32433 of 2004 KS(CO) EU(25/09/2017) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/