← Library
Madras High CourtCRP/2776/2021dismissed

The Managing Director v. Venkataraman

2021-12-22Honourable Mr Justice R. Subramanian6 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 22.12.2021

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN and C.M.P.Nos.20183, 20189 &20198 of 2021 The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Magnesite Limited, 5/53, Omalur Main Road, Jagair Ammapalayam, Salem - 636 302.

.. Petitioner in all the CRPs.

Vs.

1.Venkataraman 2.Vasantha 3.The Speical Tahsildar/ Land Acquisition Officer .. Respondents in CRP.No.2776/2021 1/6

1.T.P.Subramaniam 2.Alamelu 3.Rajendran 4.Parameswari 5.Chandrasekaran 6.Saraswathi 7.Chandrakumar 8.The Speical Tahsildar/ Land Acquisition Officer .. Respondents in CRP.No.2778/2021 1.Rajammal 2.Sambu 3.Rajendran 4.Palaniammal 5.Eswari 6.Suganya 7.Janganathan 8.Chinnathayee 9.Madhammal 10.Madhu 11.Ramasundaram 12.Palaniappan 2/6

13.Arumugam 14.The Speical Tahsildar/ Land Acquisition Officer .. Respondents in CRP.No.2780/2021 PRAYER in all the C.R.Ps: Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to strike down the R.E.P.No.219 of 2014 in L.A.O.P.No.23 of 1992, R.E.P.No.251 of 2014 in L.A.O.P.No.7 of 1993 and R.E.P.No.252 of 2014 in L.A.O.P.No.24 of 1992 respectively pending on the file of the I Additional Subordinate Judge, Salem as against the petitioner and allow the Civil Revision Petition. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Balaramesh in all the CRPs.

******* C O M M O N O R D E R The grievance of the petitioner is that the entire amounts due under the award have been paid. But, still the executing Court is proceeding with the execution on a wrong assumption that some more amounts were due. 3/6

2. This is a factual question, which cannot be decided by me, sitting in a Revision under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. It is very much open to the petitioner to approach the executing Court and file a calculation showing that the entire amounts has been paid and I am sure that the executing Court will apply its mind as well as law on the point and decide accordingly.

3. I do not see any necessity to entertain these Civil Revision Petitions and they are dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

22.12.2021 dsa Index : No Internet : Yes Speaking order 4/6

To The I Additional Subordinate Judge, Salem.

5/6

R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.

dsa 22.12.2021 6/6