A.Kannan v. The Commissioner Of

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED :21.11.2017

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.Nos.29447 and 29448 of 2013 A.Kannan ..Petitioner in W.P.No.29447 of 2013 A.Diraviaraja ..Petitioner in W.P.No.29448 of 2013 Vs.

The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005. ..Respondent in both WPs Common Prayer: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to consider petitioners representation dated 03.10.2013 in the light of existing 14 vacancies in the cadre of Deputy Commercial Tax Officer for the year 2012 more particularly within a time frame as may be stipulated by this Hon'ble Court.

For Petitioners : No appearance (in both WPs) For Respondent : M/s.Kanmani Annamalai, Additional Government Pleader (Taxes)(in both WPs) COMMON O R D E R When the writ petitions were taken up for hearing on 16.11.2017, there was no representation for the petitioners and hence, both the matters were ordered to be posted on 17.11.2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

under the caption 'for dismissal'.

2.Today, even though, the matters are listed 'for dismissal', neither the petitioners nor their counsel are present to prosecute the matters. Hence these Writ petitions are dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.

Sd/- Deputy Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar vv To, The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.

+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.83105 W.P.Nos.29447 and 29448 of 2013 RRK(12/12/2017) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/