← Library
Madras High CourtWP/24172/2023dismissed as infructuous

M.Sekar v. The District Collector

2023-08-29Honourable Mr Justice N. Sathish Kumar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 29.08.2023

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR M.Sekar ... Petitioner in W.P.No.24172 of 2023 N.Rajagopal ... Petitioner in W.P.No.24175 of 2023 S.Anthonisamy ... Petitioner in W.P.No.24179 of 2023

Versus

1.The District Collector, Pudukottai District, Pudukottai.

2.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Rural Development & Panchayat Raj Department, St.George Fort, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009.

3.The Joint Director/Project Officer, District Rural Development Agency, Kattupudukaulam, Pudukottai - 622 001.

4.The District Supply and Marketing Society, Rep. by its Secretary, DRDA Campus, Kattupudukulam, Pudukottai - 622 001.

... Respondents in all Writ Petitions COMMON PRAYER: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly in the nature of Mandamus, Page No.1 of 4

directing the respondents herein to consider and pass orders on the representation dated 05.04.2023 followed by the reminder representation, dated 29.05.2023 sent by the petitioners, with the time limit as stipulated by this Court.

For Petitioner in all Writ Petitions :

Mr.R.Srinivasalu For Respondents in all Writ Petitions :

Mr.S.Jayachandran, Government Advocate COMMON ORDER All these Writ Petitions have been filed to direct the respondents to consider and pass orders on the representation, dated 05.04.2023 followed by the reminder representation, dated 29.05.2023 sent by the petitioners, within the time limit as stipulated by this Court. 2.When these matters were taken for hearing today, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents submitted that on the representations of the petitioners, dated 29.05.2023, the 1st respondent has passed an order, dated 16.08.2023 and the same has been produced before this Court.

3.Since orders have been passed on the representations of the petitioners, the prayer sought for by the petitioner becomes infructuous and Page No.2 of 4

nothing survives in these Writ Petitions for adjudication. 4.Accordingly, these Writ Petitions are dismissed as infructuous. It is open to the petitioners to challenge the order passed by the 1st respondent, dated 16.08.2023, as per law. No costs.

29.08.2023 Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order vv2 1.The District Collector, Pudukottai District, Pudukottai.

2.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Rural Development & Panchayat Raj Department, St.George Fort, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009.

3.The Joint Director/Project Officer, District Rural Development Agency, Kattupudukaulam, Pudukottai - 622 001.

4.The District Supply and Marketing Society, Rep. by its Secretary, DRDA Campus, Kattupudukulam, Pudukottai - 622 001.

Page No.3 of 4

N.SATHISH KUMAR , J.

vv2 29.08.2023 Page No.4 of 4