← Library
Madras High CourtWP/19141/2012dismissed as infructuous

S.Kennedy v. The State Of Tamilnadu

2015-01-20Honourable Mr Justice K.K. Sasidharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 20.01.2015

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN Writ Petition No.19141 of 2012 S.Kennedy

...Petitioner

Vs.

1.The State of Tamilnadu rep. by its Secretary to Government, Tourism and Culture Department, Fort St.George, Chennai -9.

2.The Commissioner of Art and Culture, O/o The Directorate of Art and Culture, Tamil Valarchi Valagam, Chennai -8.

...Respondents

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to consider the claims of the petitioner for sanctioning incentive increment for acquiring higher qualification of Ph.D. and pass orders by extending the benefits of G.O.Ms.No.99 Tourism and Culture (Cul 1-1) Department dated 9.7.1999 within stipulated time.

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Elanchezhiyan For Respondents : Mr.M.S.Ramesh Addl. Govt.Pleader

O R D E R

The learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submitted that during the currency of the writ petition, the petitioner was given incentive increment.

2. In view of the same, the Writ Petition stands dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ svki

To 1.The (State of Tamilnadu rep. by its) Secretary to Government, Tourism and Culture Department, Fort St.George, Chennai -9.

2.The Commissioner of Art and Culture, O/o The Directorate of Art and Culture, Tamil Valarchi Valagam, Chennai -8.

+ 1 cc to Mr.G. Elanchezhiyan, Advocate Sr.2913 + 1 cc to Government pleader Sr.2808 W.P.No.19141 of 2012 SR(CO) Eu 06.02.15 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/