C.Chinnusamy v. State Rep.By
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 05.07.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mrs.JUSTICE R.HEMALATHA CRL.O.P.No.28354 of 2013 C.Chinnusamy .. Petitioner/de-facto complainant Vs 1.State represented by, The Superintendent of Police, Salem District.
2.State represented by, The Inspector of Police, Magudanchavadi Police Station, Salem District.
3.State represented by, The Inspector of Police, Sankari Police Station, Salem District.
.. Respondents/Complainants Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to transfer the investigation pending on the file of 2nd respondent to 3rd respondent or some other agency (on the petitioner's complaint dated 18.04.2013) and consequently file a final report within a stipulated time. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sivakumar For Respondents : Mr.T.Shunmugarajeswaran Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
O R D E R
The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) on instructions would contend that the petition preferred by the petitioner was closed on 31.07.2013 itself.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
2. Therefore, nothing survives for further adjudication in this petition. Hence, this petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CCC) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar dss To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Salem District.
2.The Inspector of Police, Magudanchavadi Police Station, Salem District.
3.The Inspector of Police, Sankari Police Station, Salem District.
4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
CRL.O.P.No.28354 of 2013 GSP(18/07/2018) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/