Madras High CourtWP/31511/2016closed

S.Vinayagam, v. The Chairman

2016-09-12Honourable Mr Justice B. Rajendran2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 12.09.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.RAJENDRAN WP.No.31511 of 2016 WMP.No.27351 of 2016 S.Vinayagam Petitioner Vs 1.The Chairman, Law Admission 2016-2017 The Tamil Nadu Dr.Ambedkar Law University Chennai 2.The Secretary, Bar Council of India No.Rose Revenue Institutional Area, New Delhi 110 002 3.The Secretary, Bar Council of Tamil Nadu High Court, Campus Chennai-104 Respondents Prayer:- This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the entire records connected with the proceedings of the 1st Respondent with regard to the rejection of the Petitioner's application No.A31607724, dated 23.08.2016 and to quash the same and to direct the 1st Respondent to consider the Petitioner as eligible candidate in the three year LLB Course (A.No.A31607724).

For Petitioner :

Mr.K.Jayaraman For Respondent :

Mr.L.P.Shanmugasundaram-R1

ORDER

This Writ Petition is filed against the rejection of the Petitioner's application No.A31607724, dated 23.08.2016 for admission to three years LLB Course.

2. This court heard the learned counsel on either side and also perused the materials placed on record.

3. After some elaborate arguments by the learned counsel on either side, relying on the decision of the Division Bench of this court made in WA.No.1632 of 2015, dated 08.01.2016, it is contended by the learned counsel for the 1st Respondent University that since the Petitioner did not https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

complete the SSLC in the regular course, the application for the Petitioner for admission to 3 years LLB Course was rightly rejected.

4. The Division Bench of this court made in WA.No.1632 of 2015, by judgement dated 08.01.2016 has held as under:- "25 In view of the aforestated premises, we are of the considered opinion that the appellant is not eligible under prescription of Rule 5 of the Rules of Legal Education read with Eligibility Criteria for admission to 3 years LL.B course. The respondent University has rightly rejected the appellant's candidature for admission to the said course."

5. Therefore, following the above said order of the Division Bench of this court made in WA.No.1632 of 2015, dated 08.01.2016, this Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected MP is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(J) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar Srcm To:

1.The Chairman, Law Admission 2016-2017 The Tamil Nadu Dr.Ambedkar Law University Chennai 2.

3.The Secretary, Bar Council of India No.Rose Revenue Institutional Area, New Delhi 110 002 4.The Secretary, Bar Council of Tamil Nadu High Court Campus Chennai-104 + 1 cc to Mr.L.P. Shanmugasundaram, Advocate SR.51799 WP.No.31511 of 2016 NRJK(CO) EU 05.10.16 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/