Subramani v. Vivekanadan

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 11.01.2024

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN Civil Revision Petition (NPD) No.2670 of 2021 Subramani .. Petitioner Vs.

Vivekanadan .. Respondent PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the order dated 06.10.2021 made in I.A.No.624 of 2019 in O.S.No.378 of 2015 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Dharapuram insofar as condition imposed to deposit 80% of the decree amount is concerned by allowing this Civil Revision Petition. For Petitioner : Mr.N.Ponraj For Respondent : Mr. P.Kalaimuthu 1/5

ORDER

The Revision is against an order made in IA No.624 of 2019 in OS No.378 of 2015 and an application filed to set aside the exparte decree dated 21.12.2018.

2. The respondent herein filed a suit for recovery of a sum of Rs.2,27,000/- with subsequent interest on the principal amount of Rs.2,00,000/-. The said suit was decreed exparte on 21.12.2018 since the defendant failed to cross-examine P.W.1. Immediately thereafter on 07.03.2019, the petitioner filed IA No.624 of 2019 seeking to set aside the exparte decree. That application was kept pending for almost two and half years and it is seen from the orders of the Trial Court that the respondent/plaintiff took adjournment for filing counter for two and half years, but did not file a counter.

3. After setting the respondent exparte in this application, the learned 2/5

Trial Judge imposed onerous condition of a direction to deposit 80% of the decree amount for setting aside the exparte decree. No doubt a Court is empowered to impose condition for setting aside the exparte decree, but the condition cannot be onerous condition. When the rights of parties are not decided on merits, the Court cannot impose a condition directing the petitioner to deposit a major portion of the decree amount to set aside an exparte decree. It is clear to my mind that the above condition directing the petitioner to deposit 80% of the decree amount is highly onerous and the same cannot be sustained by this Court.

4. Hence the Revision is allowed, the order imposing condition to deposit 80% of the decree amount is set aside, IA No.624 of 2019 will stand allowed subject to the condition, the petitioner pays cost of Rs.5,000/- to the respondent within a period four weeks from today. Cost shall be paid to the counsel appearing in this Court. On such payment and production of receipt, the Trial Court will restore the suit in OS No. 378 of 2015 and dispose it of in accordance with law within a period of three months there from. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is 3/5

closed.

11.01.2024 jv Index: No Internet:Yes speaking order To The Subordinate Judge, Dharapuram 4/5

R.SUBRAMANIAN jv Civil Revision Petition (NPD) No.2670 of 2021 11.01.2024 5/5