Veeramani v. State Rep By The Inspector Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 16.07.2025

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR Crl.O.P.No.19757 of 2025 Veeramani ... Petitioner Vs.

The State represented by, The Inspector of Police, W-5, Seliyur All Women Police Station.

Chennai.

(Crime No.18 of 2025) ... Respondent For Petitioner :

Mr.C.Vijay For Respondent :

Mr.R.Vinothraja Government Advocate (Criminal Side)

O R D E R

This matter has been listed today under the caption "for being mentioned" at the instance of the learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that this Court, vide order dated 11.07.2025, has granted bail to the petitioner subject to conditions. However, in the petition, the offence in Crime No.18 of 2025 has been wrongly mentioned as Sections 417 and 376(2) of IPC instead of Sections 417 and 376(1) of IPC. Hence, he prayed to modify the same. 1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.

ham

3. In view of the above, the Registry is directed to modify the offences mentioned in paragraph 1 of the order dated 11.07.2025 as per the First Information Report in Crime No.18 of 2025 i.e., as Sections 417 and 376(1) of IPC and issue fresh copy of the order.

16.07.2025 ham To

1. The II Judicial Court, Tambaram.

2. The Inspector of Police, W-5, Seliyur All Women Police Station, Chennai.

3. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Puzhal -II.

4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

Crl.O.P.No.19757 of 2025 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis