Smt.Subbathal v. Senni Malai Gounder (Died)

C.M.P.No.18197 of 2022 in A.S.No.52 of 2002 R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.

and R.KALAIMATHI, J.

The fact that the sale in favour of the 11th respondent pending appeal is not in dispute. 11th respondent though not a necessary party, he would be a proper party. Hence, this petition is ordered. The proposed respondent herein is impleaded as 11th respondent in the appeal 2.Mr.R.D.Ashok Kumar appears for the 11th respondent.

3.Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendment.

(R.S.M., J.) (R.K.M., J.) 23.08.2023 kkn https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis