Madras High CourtWP/31787/2016closed

Thiruvottiyur Advocates v. The Registrar General

2016-11-28Honourable The Chief Justice,Honourable Mr Justice R. Mahadevan3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 28.11.2016

CORAM

The HON'BLE MR.SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE AND The HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P.No.31787 of 2016 Thiruvottiyur Advocates Association rep. by its Secretary, K.Murugan Reg.No.28/1991, Thiruvottiyur Chennai - 600 019.

.. Petitioner vs.

1. The Registrar General High Court, Madras - 104.

2. The Secretary to Government Home Department

3. The Secretary to Government Law Department

4. The Secretary to Government Revenue Department

5. The District Collector Thiruvallur District, Thiruvallur.

.. Respondents PRAYER: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the representation dated 4.8.2016 made to the first respondent and consequently pass a direction to establish Combined Court Building at Thiruvottiyur based on the proposal sent by the office of the first respondent.

For Petitioner : Ms.R.Kamalarani For Respondents : Mr.S.Haja Mohideen Gisthi for 1st respondent Mr.M.K.Subramanian Government Pleader for respondents 2 to 5

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) The actual transfer of land is stated to have been completed.

2. As far as alternative space to accommodate the Court building on rental basis is concerned, the suggestion made by the petitioner on 3.11.2016 has not been found feasible.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner states that there is another building which they have located, i.e., at Old Door No.28, New No.92-93-94, Sathankadu New Lane, Thiruvottiyur, Sathankadu Village, Chengalpet District. It is stated that the consent from the owner has also been obtained. The consent letter and plan have been handed over to the learned counsel appearing for the first respondent.

4. The first respondent along with the Public Works Department will carry out an inspection and take a call on the feasibility of that premises within one month from today and if found feasible, subsequent action thereto should be completed within a period of three months thereafter.

The petition, accordingly, stands closed. No costs. Sd/- Asst.Registrar (CCC) /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar To: