← Library
Madras High CourtWP/33357/2025disposed of

M.Balachander v. The Superintendent Of Police

2025-09-03Honourable Mr Justice A.D.Jagadish Chandira5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 03-09-2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA

1. M.Balachander S/o.Muthusamy, No.21, Chairman Govindasamy Nagar, Chellam Kuppam, Cuddalore Mudhu Nagar, Cuddalore District.

Petitioner(s) Vs

1. The Superintendent Of Police Cuddalore District, Cuddalore-607 001.

2.The Account General Office Of The Account General (a And E) Tamil Nadu, No.361, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 018 Respondent(s) PRAYER Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the first respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 14.05.2025 in accordance with law and

direct the second respondent to included the name of petitioner second wife namely Ambika in petitioner Family pension records in PPO No.R0435293 maintained by the second respondent and remove the name of Padmavathy in petitioner pension Register and permit petitioner wife Constitution of Ambika, D/o.Pangaru to receive family pension and other benefits to secure the ends of justice For Petitioner(s):

E.Parthiban N.Velmurugan K.Balachander S.Muthumani For Respondent:

Mr.R.U.Dinesh Raj Kumar, AGP for R1 Mr.A.N.R.Jayaprathap, Standing counsel for R2

ORDER

Mr.R.U.Dinesh Raj Kumar, learned Additional Government Pleader accepts notice on behalf of the 1 st respondent. Mr.A.N.R.Jayaprathap, learned Standing counsel accepts notice on behalf of the 2 nd respondent. With the consent of the learned counsel on either side, the main writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. 2.The writ petition is filed for a mandamus to direct the the first respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 15.04.2025 in

accordance with law and direct the second respondent to include the name of petitioner's second wife namely Ambika in petitioner's Family pension records in PPO No.R0435293 maintained by the second respondent and remove the name of Padmavathy in the petitioner's Pension Register and permit petitioner wife Ambika, D/o.Pangaru to receive family pension and other benefits to secure the ends of justice.

3.When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the 1 st respondent would submit that the 1 st respondent has considered the representation of the petitioner dated 15.04.2025, and that a reply has been sent to the petitioner on 14.05.2025, vide communication in Na.Ka.No.J1/E.1031698/2025 informing him that his representation has been considered and that 1 st respondent has sought for certain particulars from him. However, the said particulars have not been furnished by the petitioner so far.

4.Heard both sides and perused the materials on record.

5.From the perusal of the records, it is seen that the representation of the petitioner dated 15.04.2025 has been duly considered by the 1 st respondent and a reply has been sent on 14.05.2025. In such circumstances, no further orders are required from this Court.

6.Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of, with liberty to the petitioner to furnish those documents to the respondent and proceed further in accordance with law. No costs.

03-09-2025 AP Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes To 1.The Superintendent Of Police Cuddalore District, Cuddalore-607 001.

2.The Account General Office Of The Account General (a And E) Tamil Nadu, No.361, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 018

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA J.

AP 03-09-2025