Raja Nadesan v. The State Of Tamil Nadu
2026:MHC:101
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 01.12.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN and WMP.No.4205 of
1. Raja Nadesan
2. Santhi Athiyappan
3. Jayaraj Visvanathan
4. Rani Sellappa
5. Sumathi Senthilkumar
6. Saroja Anbalagan
7. Thenarasan Arumugam
8. Chandran
9. Valarmathi Murugesan 10.Chinnadurai Arumugam 11.Aruna S 12.Rajendiran periyasamy 13.Kaliyamoorthy 14.Manikandan Govindasamy 15.Chinappa Azhagan 16.Priya 17.Jeyalakshmi Devendran 18.Azhagammal Chinnappa 19.Indhumathi Pandiyan 20.Eshvaran Karuppusamy 21.Malliyambal Jeganathan 22.Enbavalli Anbalagan 23.Thangam Asaithambi 24.Ayyasamy Karuppusamy 1/6
25.Palanisamy K, 26.Selladurai M 27.Duraikannu P.
28.Elamathi V 29.Latha 30.Sudharani ... Petitioners Vs.
1. The State of Tamil Nadu represented by the Principal Secretary to Government Department of Rural Development and Panchayat Raj, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009.
2. The District Collector, Ariyalur District, Ariyalur.
3. The District Revenue Officer, Ariyalur District, Ariyalur.
4. The Tahsildar Ariyalur Taluk Ariyalur District
5. The Block Development Officer, Ariyalur Panchayat Union Ariyalur District.
... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned notice Na.Ka.No.Oo.Se/005/2025 dated 21.04.2025 caused by the 5th respondent and quash the same and direct the respondents to segregate Survey Number 181 in No.44 Thelur Village in Ariyalur Taluk in Ariyalur District, Tamil Nadu admeasuring Hectare 05 Ares 52.50 into water course and land portions, and reclassify the land portion as tharisu land; and pass such other orders and directions as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
2/6
For Petitioners : Mrs.S.Parthi For Respondents : Mr.T.Arun Kumar Additional Government Pleader *****
O R D E R
[Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.] The Writ on hand has been instituted to assail the notice issued by the Special Officer/Block Development Officer, Thelur Panchayat.
2. The Executive Authority/Block Development Officer identified encroachments in water body. As per the respondent, the subject property has been classified as "Vaari" [small branch of Canal]. Thus, action has been initiated under Section 131 of the Tamil Nadu Panchayats Act. The Executive Authority or the Commissioner, Panchayat is empowered to initiate proceedings, if any encroachments are identified within his territorial jurisdiction. On receipt of notice, the noticee is expected to submit explanations along with the documents if any, enabling the Authority to consider. Thereafter, if the Authority is not satisfied, he has to submit a detailed report to the Revenue Authority/jurisdictional Tahsildar for initiation of eviction proceedings under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Land 3/6
Encroachment Act, 1905. The Commissioner or Executive Authority, under the provisions of the Act cannot proceed with the eviction proceedings. In the present case, notice has been issued under Section 131 of the Tamil Panchayats Act. The said notice per se would not provide any cause for institution of writ proceedings. Writ petitions filed challenging the notice is not entertainable unless it has been issued by an incompetent authority or tainted with the allegations of mala fide.
3. In the present case, the writ petition since filed challenging the notice issued under Section 131 of the Tamil Nadu Panchayat Act, it is not entertained. However, the petitioners are at liberty to submit their respective explanations along with the documents if any, to the competent authority who in turn look into the same and thereafter, submit a report to the Revenue Authority under Section 131 of the Act for initiation of the eviction proceedings under the relevant provisions of the Act. Since it is the water body, the Block Development Officer/Special Officer has to submit his report to the appropriate Authority to initiate eviction proceedings. On receipt of the report, the appropriate authority shall institute eviction proceedings, by affording opportunity to all the encroachers and thereafter, complete the eviction proceedings, within a period of four(4) months from the date of 4/6
receipt of a copy of this order.
4. With the above observations, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected WMP is also closed. [S.M.S., J.] [C.K., J.] 01.12.2025 (3/3) kmi Index : Yes Speaking order To
1. The Principal Secretary to Government State of Tamil Nadu Department of Rural Development and Panchayat Raj, Secretariat, Chennai-600 009.
2. The District Collector, Ariyalur District, Ariyalur.
3. The District Revenue Officer, Ariyalur District, Ariyalur.
4. The Tahsildar Ariyalur Taluk Ariyalur District
5. The Block Development Officer, Ariyalur Panchayat Union Ariyalur District.
5/6
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.
and C.KUMARAPPAN, J.
kmi 01.12.2025 (3/3) 6/6