← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/23089/2021dismissed

B.Balaji v. Inspector Of Police

2021-12-02Honourable Mrs Justice T.V.Thamilselvi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Second day of December Two Thousand Twenty One PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs Justice T.V.THAMILSELVI CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.23089 of 2021 B.BALAJI [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs THE STATE REP.BY [ RESPONDENT ] INSPECTOR OF POLICE TEAM NO.28, CCB(JOB ROCKET), VEPERY, CHENNAI-600 007.

CR.NO.84/2021.

For Petitioner : M/S.A.ATHIMOOLAM Advocate For Respondent : MR.N.S.SUGANTHAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR BAIL 439 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- (The case has been heard through video conference) The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 08.10.2021 for the offences under Sections 406, 420, 465 and 468 of IPC, in Crime No.84 of 2021, seeks bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the accused persons on the false promise of arranging Government Jobs for the daughters of the defacto complainant, had received a sum of Rs.44,50,000/- on various dates and issued appointment orders. Thereafter, the defacto complainant came to know that the appointment orders are fake one and he was cheated by the accused. Hence, the complaint. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is no way connected with the alleged offence and he has been falsely implicated in this case.

The petitioner had earlier worked with A1 in the 2017 and thereafter, he left the job and joined in a company namely M/s.Mass Media Creatives Private Limited and he was working in the said company till his arrest and https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.

that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the petitioner's name is not found in the FIR and he is a first time offender. This is the 2nd application for bail and the earlier application was dismissed by this Court in Crl.O.P.No.20925 of 2021 dated 09.11.2021 and that the petitioner has been suffering incarceration for about 50 days from 08.10.2021. Hence, he prays for grant of bail to the petitioner. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would raise objection stating that it is a case of job racketing. The petitioner along with others by giving false promise of getting job in the Secretariat, have received more than forty lakhs which needs a detailed enquiry. A1 has already been detained under Goondas. Insofar as the petitioner is concerned, he has helped A1 in collecting money from the defacto complainant and printing the Government letters.

5. Considering the nature of offence and the fact that the case needs a detailed enquiry and hence, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.

-sd/- 02/12/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE TEAM NO.28, CCB(JOB ROCKET), VEPERY, CHENNAI-600 007.

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

3 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, PUZHAL, CHENNAI.

+1 CC to M/S.A.ATHIMOOLAM Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO.14075 CRL OP.23089/2021 Date :02/12/2021 TA-13/12/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/