← Library
Madras High CourtWP/26837/2025disposed of

S.Rajeswari v. The Additional Chief Secretary / Commissioner

2025-07-23Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh6 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 23-07-2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH

1. S.Rajeswari W/o Late G. Sriramulu 2.E.Santhi D/o Late G. Sriramulu 3.E. Sheela D/o Late G. Sriramulu 4.S.Palani S/o Late G. Sriramulu 5.S. Gopinath S/o Late G. Sriramulu 6.S. Logeswari D/o Late G. Sriramulu 7.S. Deepak S/o Late G. Sriramulu Petitioner(s) Vs

1. The Additional Chief Secretary / Commissioner

Revenue Administration Government Of Tamil Nadu Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009 2.The District Collector Collectorate Chennai Rajaji Salai, Fourth Floor George Town Chennai 600 001 3.The Tahsildar Aminjikarai Taluk Bharathipuram Main Road, Gajalakshmi Colony Kathiravan Colony Shenoy Nagar, Chennai 600 Respondent(s) PRAYER Call for the records pertaining in proceedings vide K. Dis / 2940 / 2018 dated 26.10.2018 on the file of the third respondent and quash the same and consequently direct the third respondent to conduct a fresh enquiry and issue the legal heir ship certificate of Late. G. Sriramulu to the petitioners, within a time frame as may be stipulated by this Court.

For Petitioner(s):

Mr.P.Prabu For Respondent:

Mr.R.Neelakandan Additional Advocate General asst by Mr.T.M.Rajangam Government Advocate for R1-3

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned proceedings of the 3 rd Respondent dated 26.10.2018, wherein the request made by the petitioner for issuing the legal heirship certificate on the demise of the Late. G. Sriramulu was rejected.

2. There is absolutely no explanation on the side of the petitioners as to why it took the petitioners such a long time to approach this Court when the impugned proceedings have been issued by the 3 rd Respondent as early as in the year 2018.

3. The Learned Counsel for the petitioners submitted that the 1 st Petitioner is the second wife of Late. G. Sriramulu, and she is none other than the sister of the First Wife, and she married G. Sriramulu after the demise of her sister. The Learned Counsel for the petitioner further submitted that the Petitioners 2 to 4 are the children of the First Wife, and Petitioners 5 to 7 are the children of the Second Wife.

4. In light of the above stand taken by the learned Counsel for the petitioners, there shall be a direction to the petitioners to submit a fresh application before the 3 rd Respondent, giving all the particulars and by filing the relevant documents. Insofar as the Petitioners 2 to 7 are concerned, there must be no difficulty in adding their names in the legal heirship certificate, since they

are admittedly the children of the First and Second Wives. An enquiry has to be conducted only insofar as the 1 st Petitioner is concerned.

5. The specific case of the petitioners is that the First Petitioner was married to the deceased Late. G. Sriramulu after the demise of the First Wife, who is none other than the sister of the First Petitioner. After this fact is established, the name of the First Petitioner shall also be added in the legal heirship certificate. The process shall be completed by the 3 rd Respondent within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the fresh application submitted by the petitioners seeking legal heirship certificate.

6. This writ petition is disposed of in the above terms. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions, if any, are closed. 23-07-2025 gd Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes

To 1.The Additional Chief Secretary / Commissioner Revenue Administration Government Of Tamil Nadu Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009 2.The District Collector Collectorate Chennai Rajaji Salai, Fourth Floor George Town Chennai 600 3.The Tahsildar Aminjikarai Taluk Bharathipuram Main Road, Gajalakshmi Colony Kathiravan Colony Shenoy Nagar, Chennai 600

N.ANAND VENKATESH J.

gd 23-07-2025 1/2