Harikrishnan @ Harikrishna v. The Tahsildar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 25.11.2022

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI Harikrishnan @ Harikrishna . . . Petitioner Vs.

The Tahsildar Soolagiri District, Krishnagiri . . . Respondent PRAYER:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ, direction or order in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to dirct the respondent to issue separate patta in the petitioner's name. For Petitioner : M/s.G.Selvi George For Respondents : Mr.T.K.Saravanan, Government Advocate 1/4

ORDER

This matter is listed under the caption "For issuance of Patta" at the instance of the learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent submits that the petitioner's application was considered and the same was rejected.

3. In view of the above submission, nothing survives for further adjudication in this matter. Hence, this Writ Petition is closed granting liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy in the manner known to law. No costs.

25.11.2022 NHS Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No 2/4

To The Tahsildar Soolagiri District, Krishnagiri 3/4

M.DHANDAPANI, J.

NHS 25.11.2022 4/4