← Library
Madras High CourtCRL RC/1270/2025disposed of

S.Imran Bathusha v. Executive Magistrate Cum Revenue Divisional Officer

2025-07-31Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 31.07.2025

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN S.Imran Bathusha No.1/1, Vandikara Street, Namakkal District - 637 001.

...Petitioner

Vs.

1. Executive Magistrate cum Revenue Divisional Officer, Namakkal Division, Namakkal District.

2. The Inspector of Police, Namakkal Police Station, Namakkal, Namakkal District.

3. Thoulath Khan S/o. Kaleel, 2C, Azees Street, Namakkal - 637 001.

... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Revision Petition filed under Section 438 r/w. 442 of BNSS, 2023, to call for the records relating to the order dated 03.07.2025 made in Na.Ka.4139/2024(M1) by the first respondent, to set aside the portion of refusal order in respect of Aalava @ Pookuzhi festival and

consequently direct the first respondent to grant permission to conduct Aalava @ Pookuzhi festival.

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Ilayaraj Kumar for Mr.R.Krishnan For Respondents : Mr.A.Gopinath Govt. Advocate (Crl.side) for R1 & R2

ORDER

This revision has been preferred as against the order dated 03.07.2025 made in Na.Ka.4139/2024(M1) by the first respondent herein.

2. The petitioner is arrayed as 'A' party and the third respondent is arrayed as 'B' party in a Peace Committee Meeting conducted by the first respondent and some resolution has been passed in the Peace Committee Meeting. Though the petitioner's 'A' party participated in the Peace Committee Meeting, they did not agree for the resolution and did not sign in the resolution. Whereas, the 'B' party i.e. the third respondent and others have signed in the resolution.

3. The present Revision Petition has been filed to set aside the resolution passed by the Peace Committee Meeting. Since the petitioner's 'A' party did not sign in the resolution, the said resolution will not bind the 'A' party. Even assuming that 'A' & 'B' parties signed in the resolution, the said resolution has no legal sanctity since it is only a resolution resolved between two parties. It has only evidential value and it can be used before the Civil Court.

4. In view of the above observation, this Criminal Revision Case is disposed.

31.07.2025 Index : Yes/No : Yes/No Speaking/non-speaking order bkn

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

bkn To

1. Executive Magistrate cum Revenue Divisional Officer, Namakkal Division, Namakkal District.

2. The Inspector of Police, Namakkal Police Station, Namakkal, Namakkal District.

3. The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court.

31.07.2025