← Library
Madras High CourtWP/24547/2023disposed of

C.Muruganantham v. The Managing Director

2023-08-21Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan5 pages

THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 21.08.2023

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN and W.M.P. Nos.23962 to 23964 of 2023 1.C.Muruganantham

2. S.Baskar

3. A.Arul .... Petitioners Vs 1.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Limited, IV Floor, CMDA Tower II, Egmore, Chennai - 600 008.

2. The District Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Limited, P.4, Ambattur Estate, Chennai South District, Chennai - 600 058.

.... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the second respondent vide Proceedings Se.Mu.No.Rv-1/233/2023 dated 26.07.2023 and to quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioners in service with all attendant benefits.

1/5

For Petitioner :

Ms.G.Punniakoti For Respondents :

Mr.K.Sathishkumar

O R D E R

The Writ Petition has been filed challenging the suspension order dated 26.07.2023 issued against the petitioners.

2. It is the case of the petitioners that they are working in Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Limited (TASMAC) at Shop No.715 in Chennai. On the allegation that the petitioners sold liquor more than the marked price and collected extra Rs.40/-, they are suspended by the order dated 26.07.2023.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that it is an en masse suspension. Further, the amount was collected in electronic mode and credited into the account of the Corporation and hence, the suspension is contrary to the Code of Prevention and Detection of Fraudulent Acts in Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Limited.

4. According to learned counsel for the petitioners, the 2/5

above conduct of selling liquor at excess amount will not amount to any serious irregularities warranting suspension immediately. Hence, they sought to quash the suspension order.

5. On a perusal of the materials, it is seen that the very allegation against the petitioners is they sold the liquor at excess price of Rs.40/- per bottle and based on the above allegation, they were suspended. It is relevant to note that the Code of Prevention and Detection of Fraudulent Acts in Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Limited, has been framed to prevent and detect fraud. The code also mandates that if an employee is suspended pending enquiry, he shall be paid subsistence allowance.

6. In such view of the matter as the very allegation against the petitioners is that they sold the liquor at excess amount more than the marked price, this Court is of the view that at this stage, entertaining the Writ Petition and quashing of the suspension does not arise at all. The respondents shall conclude the disciplinary proceedings if any, within a period of two months. It is also made it very clear that till the disciplinary 3/5

proceedings are concluded, the petitioners are entitled for subsistence allowance.

7. With the above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. No costs.

21.08.2023 Internet: Yes Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Lpp To 1.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Limited, IV Floor, CMDA Tower II, Egmore, Chennai - 600 008.

2. The District Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Limited, P.4, Ambattur Estate, Chennai South District, Chennai - 600 058.

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.

4/5

Lpp 21.08.2023 5/5