← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/21145/2025dismissed

Midhalraj v. The State Rep By, The Inspector Of Police

2025-09-03Honourable Dr Justice G. Jayachandran4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 03.09.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Dr.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN Crl.O.P.No.21145 of 2025 Midhalraj ... Petitioner Vs.

State Rep by The Inspector of Police, PEW Gummidipoondi Police Station, Thiruvallur District.

... Respondent (Cr.No.304 of 2024) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Cr.No.304 of 2024 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondent :

Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl.Side)s

O R D E R

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 12.11.2024, for the offence punishable under Sections 8(c), 20(b)(ii)(C), 29(1), 25 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 in Cr.No.304 of 2024, on the file of the respondent, seeks bail. 1/4

2. The petitioner herein along with the other accused found in possession of 40 kgs of ganja carrying in a Tata Nano car. Hence, he was arrested on 12.11.2024 by the respondent police. The present petition is filed for seeking bail.

3. Today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and opposed for grant of bail to the petitioner on the ground that the petitioner found in possession of commercial quantity of ganja. All the accused are belong to other States. If the petitioner is granted bail, there is every possibility of absconding. He further submitted that this petitioner is having one previous case of similar nature and therefore recurrence of crime also cannot be ruled out.

5. Considering the fact that the seized contraband is of commercial quantity and there is reasonable belief to hold that this petitioner had concious possession of the contraband which was transported in the car in which the petitioner was one of the co-passengers, this Court is not inclined 2/4

to grant bail to the petitioner. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition for bail stands dismissed.

03.09.2025 Vv To 1.The District Munsif-Cum- Judicial Magistrate, Gummidipoondi.

2. The Inspector of Police, PEW Gummidipoondi Police Station, Thiruvallur District.

3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

3/4

Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.

Vv Crl.O.P.No.21145 of 2025 03.09.2025 4/4