Madras High CourtWP/32286/2016disposed of

V.Jai Rajesh Kumar v. The District Collector

2017-04-18Honourable Mr Justice M.M.Sundresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 18.04.2017

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH WRIT PETITION No. 32286 of 2016 and W.M.P.No.28012 of 2016 V.Jai Rajesh Kumar ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The District Collector, Villupuram District, Villupuram.

2. The Chairman, Neyveli Lignite Corporation of India, Neyveli.

3. The Chief Regional Manager, Neyveli Lignite Corporation of India, Chetpet, Chennai.

4. The Executive Engineer, NLC/ TNEB Cuddalore, Dheeba Nagar First Street, Seemandalam, Cuddalore 607 001.

5. Tamil Nadu Transmission Corporation Ltd., General Construction Circle -2 Chennai, A-10, Thiru-Vi-Ka Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai 600 032.

(Erection of Transmission Lines) 6.The Chairman, TANTRANSCO, 144, Anna Salai, Chennai.

7.The Superintendent Engineer, General Construction Circle, TNEB, P.B.No.820, Mannarpuram, Trichy - 620 020.

... Respondents (R6 and R7 impleaded as per order dated 21.09.2016 in W.M.P.No.28324 of 2016)

Prayer: The writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, direction in the nature of writ for bearing the respondents from erecting the High Tension Electric Towers in my lands in the following lands at New S.Nos.107/1 to 10, 107/12, 99/4 to 9, 99/14, 106/3, 106/6 to 8, 106/10 in Pathiri Village, Tindivanam Taluk, Villupuram District, without first considering of the petitioner's objections dated 23.08.2016, 31.08.2016 and 01.09.2016 addressed to the 1st, 3rd and 4th respondents herein and pass such further or other order.

For Petitioner :M/s.N.Mala For Respondents :Mr.S.Diwakar, Special Government Pleader for R1 Mr.Benjamin George for R2 and R3 Mr.M.Varun Kumar for R4 to R7

O R D E R

Heard M/s.N.Mala, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Mr.S.Diwakar, learned Special Government Pleader, apearing for the first respondent, Mr.Benjamin George, learned counsel for the respondents 2 and 3 and Mr.M.Varum Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the respondents 4 to 7. 2.It is agreed by all the learned counsels that the matter may be referred to the first respondent, who can exercise power under Section 10 r/w. 16 of the Indian Telegraphic Act. 3.In such view of the matter, the objection of the petitioner is referred to the first respondent. The other respondents also to whom the petitioner has raised the objection shall refer the same to the first respondent. On receipt of the aforesaid, the first respondent shall conduct an enquiry and conclude it within a period of six weeks thereafter, after due notice to the parties concerned.

4.With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar