Madras High CourtCRL OP/23554/2021dismissed

S.Dinakaran v. State Rep By

2021-12-07Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Seventh day of December Two Thousand Twenty One PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.23554 of 2021 S.DINAKARAN [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs STATE REP BY [ RESPONDENT ] INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CCIW CID, INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, GUINDY, CHENNAI.

CR.NO.1/2021.

For Petitioner : M/S. C.PRAKASAM Advocate For Respondent : Mr.S.BALAJI, Government Advocate (Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence under Sections 408, 409, 468, 471, 477(A) and 109 of I.P.C. in Cr.No.1 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the accused are employees of Sembakkam Cooperative Housing Society and they are alleged to have mis-appropriated a sum of Rs.1,69,51,000/-. The allegation against the petitioner is that he has not paid the matured fixed deposit amount to the depositors and as such mis-appropriated a sum of Rs.10,50,000/-.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. The learned counsel further submitted that the petitioner is a member of the society and that already Surcharge proceedings has been initiated against the main accused and properties worth more than Rs.10 Crores have been attached. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) would submit that earlier, the petitioner approached this Court by filing Crl.O.P.No.19070 of 2021 and this Court vide order dated 01.11.2021 has dismissed the said petition.

5.Considering the huge amount involved in the case and the gravity of the offence allegedly committed by the petitioner and since there is no change in circumstances subsequent to the order passed in Crl.O.P.No.19070 of 2021, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6.This criminal original petition is accordingly dismissed. -sd/- 07/12/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CCIW CID, INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, GUINDY, CHENNAI.

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

CC to M/S. C.PRAKASAM Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.23554/2021 Date :07/12/2021 RVR 14/12/2021 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/