Subramani v. Pappathi

C.M.P.Nos.16979, 16981, 16983 of 2022 in C.R.P.No.2234 of 2015 and C.M.P.Nos.17166, 17165, 17172 of 2022 in C.R.P.No.2235 of 2015 S.S. SUNDAR , J.

and N. MALA, J.

[Order of the Court was made by S.S. SUNDAR, J.] These petitions are filed to condone the delay of 52 days in filing an application to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the 1st respondent, namely, Pappathi, in the Civil Revision Petitions; to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the 1st respondent in the Civil Revision Petitions; and to bring on record the legal representatives of the deceased 1st respondent, as respondents 5 to 7 in both the Civil Revision Petitions.

2.Mr.T.Dhanyakumar, learned counsel, submits that he undertakes to file vakalat for the proposed respondents 5 to 7, and he has no objection for ordering all these petitions.

3.Further, this Court is convinced with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of these petitions. Therefore, all these petitions are ordered as prayed for.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

S.S. SUNDAR , J.

and N. MALA, J.

mkn 4.Registry is directed to carry out the necessary amendment in the papers.

(S.S.S.R., J.) (N.M., J.) 27.10.2022 (1/3) mkn C.M.P.Nos.16979, 16981, 16983, 17166, 17165, 17172 of 2022 in C.R.P.Nos.2234 & 2235 of 2015 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis