Tvl Lg Fashion v. The Assistant Commissioner (St)

W.P.No.24255 of 2024 and W.M.P.Nos.26501 and 26503 of 2024 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.

This matter is listed today under the caption "for being mentioned" at the instance of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the order dated 20.08.2024 made in W.P.No.24255 of 2024, it is wrongly mentioned as "10% of demand" instead of "10% of disputed tax demand".

3. The learned Government Advocate (Taxes) submits that in this regard, the instructions have already been issued to the Department to consider the term "10% of the demand" as "10% of the disputed tax demand". Further, he submits that he had also instructed jurisdictional officer concerned to accept only 10% of the disputed tax amount.

4. The submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Taxes) is recorded. Hence, no further clarification is required. 29.08.2024 asi https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis