D.Sundaram, v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated: 1.9.2015 Coram:

The Hon'ble Mr.Justice M.Jaichandren Writ Petition No.29825 of 2012 1.D.Sundaram 2.D.Maruthamuthu 3.D.Selvaraj 4.D.Kamatchiammal ..

Petitioners vs.

1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Perambalur Dist.

2.The Tahsildar, Kunnam Taluk, Perambalur Dist.

3.Durai Raj .. Respondents Prayer: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to comply with the direction of the 1st respondent passed in his proceedings in Na.Ka.A2/911/2012, dated 24.7.2012. For petitioners :

No appearance For respondents :

Mr.R.Ravichandran, AGP for R1 &R2 Mr.R.Parthiban for R3

O R D E R

When the above Writ Petition had been listed for hearing, on 28.8.2015, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Therefore, the matter was directed to be listed today, i.e. on 1.9.2015, under the caption, 'for dismissal'.

2. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for nonprosecution. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar True Copy Sub Assistant Registrar gs.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To 1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Perambalur Dist.

2.The Tahsildar, Kunnam Taluk, Perambalur Dist.

1 cc to Mr.R.Parthiban, Advocate Sr.No.46721 1 cc to Government Pleader.Sr.No.47280 WP 29825 of 2012 ala(co) pmk.15.9.2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/