Tharun Prasanth v. The State Rep By, The Inspector Of Police
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 23.07.2025
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR 1.
Tharun Prasanth 2.
Geetha ... Petitioners Vs.
The State represented by, The Inspector of Police, V-6, Kolathur Police Station, Chennai - 600 099.
... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest in connection with Crime No.213 of 2025 on the file of respondent Police.
For Petitioners :
M/s.K.Anusarala For Respondent :
Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam Government Advocate (Criminal Side)
O R D E R
The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 119(i), 351(3) of BNS r/w 4 of TNPHW in Crime No.213 of 2025, on the file of the respondent Police, seek anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that due to the pathway dispute, on the 1/4
alleged date of occurrence, the accused abused and assaulted the de facto complainant. Hence the case.
3. The contention of the petitioners is that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He also submitted that the petitioners are ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed for grant of anticipatory bail.
4. Learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and opposed for granting anticipatory bail to the petitioners. He further submitted that there is a counter case and in the present case, the petitioners are arrayed as A1 & A2.
5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on either sides and taking note of the nature of the allegations, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.
7. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned XIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai, on condition that the petitioners shall execute separate bond each for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with 2/4
two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stands dismissed and on further condition that:
[a] if the petitioners fails to surrender before the said Magistrate within a period of fifteen days, this Order shall stand automatically cancelled;
[b] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity; [c] the petitioners shall report before the respondent Police everyday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of three weeks and thereafter as and when required; [d] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial and he shall make themselves available for interrogation by a Police Officer as and when required; [e] the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly cause any threat to the de facto complainant and witnesses and shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;
3/4
M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.
ham [f] the petitioners to give an undertaking that if required for being identified by witnesses during investigation or for police custody beyond the first fifteen days, he shall comply to the directions as may be given by the Court in this regard;
[g] On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the aforementioned conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283]; [h] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S. 23.07.2025 ham To
1. The XIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai.
2. The Inspector of Police, V-6, Kolathur Police Station, Chennai - 600 099.
3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.
4/4