D.Vikram v. State Represented By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 16.07.2025

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR D.Vikram ... Petitioner Vs.

The State represented by, The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station.

Vandalur, Chengalpattu District.

... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.13 of 2025 on the file of the respondent Police.

For Petitioner :

Mr.M.Mubeen For Respondent :

Mr.R.Vinothraja Government Advocate (Criminal Side)

O R D E R

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 09.05.2025 in connection with Crime No.13 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 5(i)(ii), 5(i), 6(1) of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the accused, on the false promise of marriage, had committed penetrative sexual assault on the minor victim girl, due to which, she became pregnant. Hence the case. 1/4

3. The contention of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner is that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner and the victim girl were in love and their relationship is consensual and further, the petitioner, who is an unmarried man, has no intention to deceive the victim girl and he is ready to marry her. He also submitted that on coming to know about the relationship between the petitioner and the victim girl, the parents of the victim objected the same and gave a false complaint. Hence, he prayed for grant of bail.

4. Learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and opposed for granting bail to the petitioner. He further submitted that the statement has been recorded from the victim girl under Section 183 BNSS and the fetus of the victim was aborted.

5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record including the victim's statement under Section 183 BNSS.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the submission made by the learned counsel appearing on either side and taking note of the period of incarceration undergone by the petitioner and considering the statement given by the minor victim girl, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

2/4

7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Special Court for exclusive trial of the cases under POCSO Act (Principal District and Sessions Court), Kancheepuram, and on further conditions that: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity;

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police, everyday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation; [c] the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a Police Officer as and when required; [d] the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly cause any threat to the de facto complainant and witnesses; [e] the petitioner to give an undertaking that if required for being identified by witnesses during investigation or for police custody beyond the first fifteen days, he shall comply to the directions as may be given by the Court in this regard; [f] On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the 3/4

M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.

ham aforementioned conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283];

[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S.

16.07.2025 ham Note :

1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.

2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code.

To

1. The Special Court for exclusive trial of cases under POCSO Act, (Principal District and Sessions Court), Kancheepuram.

2. The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Vandalur, Chengalpattu District.

3. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Puzhal - II.

4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

4/4