Prasanna v. State Repby
Crl.O.P.No.23016 of 2022 A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA , J.
The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 25.08.2022 for the offences punishable under Sections 392 r/w 397 & 506(ii) of IPC, in Crime No.405 of 2022, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with the other accused waylaid the defacto complainant and by brandishing knife, had snatched a sum of Rs.5,500/- and POCO Cell phone from the defacto complainant. Hence the complaint.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case and a false complaint has been given as against him. Therefore, he prays for grant of bail to the petitioner.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent would submit that the petitioner along with the other 1/4
accused robbed a sum of Rs.5,500/- and a mobile phone from the defacto complainant by brandishing knife. He would also submit that the petitioner has got 4 previous cases as against him and one for the offence punishable under Section 307 of IPC and another for Section 324 of IPC. Therefore, he vehemently opposed to grant bail to the petitioner.
5. The previous cases against the petitioner are listed hereunder:- Sl.No Police Station Crime No.
Offences D1 872/2021 294(b), 323, 307 & 506(ii) of IPC D1 509/2021 294(b), 324 & 506(ii) of IPC D1 482/2019 75(i)(c) of TNCP Act D1s 1070/2019 75(i)(c) of TNCP Act
6. Heard both the learned Counsel and perused the materials available on record.
7. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made by the learned counsel and that the petitioner has got 4 previous cases, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
2/4
8. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed for the present.
27.09.2022 3/3 rgi 3/4
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA , J.
rgi Crl.O.P.No.23016 of 2022 27.09.2022 3/3 4/4