← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/20021/2025dismissed

Ranjithkumar v. The State Rep. By The Inspector Of Police,

2025-07-15Honourable Mr Justice M. Nirmal Kumar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 15.07.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR Ranjithkumar ... Petitioner Vs.

State rep. by The Inspector of Police, RS Puram Police Station, Coimbatore District.

Crime No.278 of 2024 ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the Petitioner/Accused on bail in Crime No.278 of 2024 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner :

Mr.A.Saranraj For Respondent :

Mr.R.Vinothraja Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

O R D E R

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 20.05.2025 in connection with Crime No.278 of 2024 for the offence under Sections 109, 329(4), 351(3) of BNS [ 307, 427 and 506(ii) of IPC @ 307,148, 273, 120(b) of IPC on the file of the respondent police seeks bail. 1/4

2. The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant is working as a collection agent in a Finance Company and there arose a prior enmity between the defact complainant and A4 and his relatives and therefore, A4 approached other accused including the petitioner for murdering the defacto complainant and on the date of occurrence, all the accused trespassed into the defacto complainant's house and attacked him using knife, due to which, defacto complainant sustained grievous injuries. Hence, the case.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed for grant of bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) while opposing for grant of bail to the petitioner reiterated the case of the prosecution. He further submitted that, apart from this case, petitioner has 36 previous cases. 2/4

5. Considering the bad antecedents of the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 15.07.2025 sma To 1.The Inspector of Police, RS Puram Police Station, Coimbatore District.

2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

3/4

M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.

sma 15.07.2025 4/4