Sakthivel v. State Rep By

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA , J.

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 28.08.2022, for the offences punishable under Sections 4(1-A), 4(1)(aa) of TNP Act, in Crime No.360 of 2022, on the file of the respondent police, seek bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was found in possession of 60 litres of ID Arrack. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Therefore, he prays for grant of bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent would submit that the petitioner was found in possession of 60 litres of ID Arrack. He would also submit that the petitioner is a

habitual offender and he has 5 previous cases as against him. Therefore, he vehemently opposed to grant bail to the petitioner.

5. Heard both the learned Counsel and perused the materials available on record.

6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and the submission made by the learned counsel and also the fact that the petitioner has got 5 previous cases, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed for the present.

10.10.2022 rgi

A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA , J.

rgi 10.10.2022